Gambling carries financial risk; availability depends on your jurisdiction. Please play responsibly: responsible gambling help.
Every figure checked against its source
In short: Cloudbet is the only one of the eight sites we read that prints a withdrawal fee against each ETH network it credits, with a minimum beside it. Its own register row reads Assessment in progress, and that trade runs through the whole list.
We read the terms of eight crypto casinos and searched every licence number in the register that issued it. All eight turned up. Three print details the register does not confirm.
Prints four ETH networks, a 0.0002 ETH minimum withdrawal in each, a deposit fee of 0 and a separate withdrawal fee per network. No other site of the eight prints a per-network withdrawal fee, and only mBit Casino names a network at all.
Licence OGL/2024/1337/0628 sits in the Curaçao register as Indefinite with no expiry date, and the details printed on the site match it. Clause 5.2 also names the moment identity checks arrive, in any event before your first withdrawal.
Alberta and Ontario appear by name in clause 14.3, which is more than any rival file of ours says about Canada. Stake prints no licence number at all, so we found its row through company number 145353.
Takes ERC-20 only and calls other protocols unsupported, though it never says what becomes of coins sent on one. Its 0.002 ETH minimum deposit is the only deposit minimum we could read anywhere in the eight.
One Anjouan licence covers bitcasino.io, livecasino.io and sportsbet.io until . The footer prints the number three times ending in F12, and the register answers only to FI2.
| Operator | Register status | Printed details match | Networks named | Withdrawal fee | Identity checks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudbet | Assessment in progress | No, issue date differs | Four, including Arbitrum and Base | 0.00000424 ETH on mainnet | At the operator's discretion |
| Shuffle.com | Curaçao, indefinite | Matches | None | Not published | Before your first withdrawal |
| Stake.com | Assessment in progress | Matches | None | Not published | At Stake's sole discretion |
| mBit Casino | Curaçao, indefinite | No, BV against NV | One, ERC-20 only | Not published | At deposit and to unlock an account |
| Bitcasino.io | Anjouan, valid to | No, number printed as F12 | None | Not published | Not published |
| Metaspins | Anjouan, valid to | Matches | None | Not published | At an unnamed threshold |
| Rollbit | Anjouan, valid to | Matches | None | Not published | From time to time |
| BC.Game | Anjouan, valid to | Matches | None | Not published | When creating an account |
The site that publishes the most sits above sites with cleaner register rows, and that is deliberate. Cloudbet's entry in the Curaçao register reads Assessment in progress. Its printed issue date of does not match the register's , and it publishes no restricted-territory list at all. It still leads that axis. No other site of the eight answers the three questions that cost a player money: which network, what minimum, whose fee.
Plenty of reviewers would order this differently. Put register tidiness first and Shuffle.com leads on an Indefinite status with no expiry date. We weight published figures above a tidy row, and we would rather name that choice than bury it.
Three of the eight print a detail the register does not confirm, and all three take under a minute to check. Bitcasino.io prints ALSI-202509076-F12 three times. Cloudbet prints an issue date of against the register's . mBit Casino prints Scores55 Tech BV where the Curaçao register holds Scores55 Tech NV
None of that makes a licence fake. What it ruins is the operator's own footer as a lookup key. That is a smaller problem with a sharper edge: the careful player is the one who ends up misled.
The one character is the digit in that printed F12, and putting a letter I in its place finds the missing licence at once. ALSI-202509076-FI2 returns a single row on the Anjouan register: EZ Spins Ltd, status Valid, issued , expiring , with three domains on one licence.
That is the cheapest verification on this page, which is why the ranking rewards it. A register search either returns a row or it does not. Almost everything else an operator says about itself has to be taken on trust.
Assessment in progress is the register's phrase, not ours. The Curaçao Gaming Authority prints it against Medium Rare NV and Halcyon Super Holdings BV, the companies behind Stake.com and Cloudbet. Both rows sit on page 6 of 20 of a register updated , with a date in the Expires column that has already passed.
We do not say either licence has lapsed, and the authority's own register page explains why: it warns that its overviews do not guarantee current validity. Two rows marked Indefinite sit a few pages away with no expiry date at all. Shuffle.com and mBit Casino hold those, which is the strongest row shape a reader can hope for.
Three of the eight stayed off the ranking, and three of them for reasons worth naming. We do not recommend BC.Game to a player who wants the access question answered in writing. Across the terms we read, Canada and Ontario appear zero times, and no territory list appears at all. There is nothing to check before you deposit.
Rollbit is the second. We do not recommend Rollbit to anyone who wants to look up the company behind the site. Its terms name Acacia Tech Ltd and a Nevis address without a registration number, and the same terms reserve the right to refuse customers from any country.
Metaspins is the third, and the thinnest file we built. Its legal entity is printed as its own registration number, 3-102-959384 SRL. The first-deposit offer on its home page reads 100% up to 2,500 USDT with no wagering figure beside it, while clause 14.14.1.1 sets wagering at 1x the reward. Clause 14.11 caps bets at 5 USDT while a bonus is live.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Operators read in full: | 8, on |
| Licences confirmed in a register: | 8 of 8 |
| Footers that disagree with the register: | 3 |
| Operators ranked on this page: | 5 |
Three questions come back empty at every one of the eight, and a fourth at seven of them, and they are the questions support queues are made of. How many confirmations before a deposit is credited. What figure triggers an identity check. How long a withdrawal takes. What the operator charges on top of the network.
| Disclosure | How many of the eight | Where we read it |
|---|---|---|
| Licence found in a public register | 8 of 8 | Anjouan register and the Curaçao PDF |
| Printed details match the register | 5 of 8 | Operator footers against those registers |
| Deposit network named | 2 of 8 | Cloudbet and mBit Casino terms |
| Operator withdrawal fee published | 1 of 8 | Cloudbet's own fee table |
| Confirmations before credit published | 0 of 8 | Terms and help pages of all eight |
| Identity-check threshold as a figure | 0 of 8 | Terms of all eight |
| Withdrawal timing we could read | 0 of 8 | Terms and help pages of all eight |
Read on ; the maker can change a screen without saying so.
Shuffle.com gets close on the second question without answering it. Clause 5.2 names the event rather than the amount, in any event before your first withdrawal, which at least tells a player when to have documents ready. The threshold itself stays a number the operator sets from time to time.
Need the fee in writing: Cloudbet prints one, alone among the eight. Need to know when identity checks start: Shuffle.com puts it before your first withdrawal in clause 5.2. Need your province named rather than implied: Stake.com names Alberta and Ontario, to exclude you. Need a register row with no expiry date: Shuffle.com and mBit Casino both hold one. And if what you need is a casino licensed to take crypto from a Canadian, none of these qualifies. The note under Standard 5.69 keeps that licence out of the regulated market entirely.
This site takes no deposits and runs no identity checks; both stay off it entirely.
More on this subject, from the same section first:
2 slots, 1 provider barred in Canada
CAD 0.0316 median, 4.76x on USDT
Ontario 19, Alberta and Quebec 18
0 of 8 publish confirmation counts
Licence OGL/2024/1451/0918, not printed on site
Readers ask these before they send anything. The answers come from the eight sites we read on and from the registers that issued their licences.
No. None of the eight sites we read appears in the iGaming Ontario directory, which lists 49 operators and 84 gaming websites.
Licence checks start in the footer: we copy the number, search the register that issued it, and write down both strings when they disagree.
No. Stake's prohibited-jurisdiction clause names Alberta and Ontario, and we read that clause rather than testing access from Canada.
Cloudbet, alone among the eight: 0.00000424 ETH on Ethereum mainnet, with separate figures for Arbitrum, Base and BNB Smart Chain.
No. Withdrawal timing was missing from all eight sites we read, which is why the money group scores low across the board.
No. Rollbit names Acacia Tech Ltd and a Nevis address in its terms but publishes no company registration number to search.
A note under Standard 5.69 of the Registrar's Standards for Internet Gaming: "Cryptocurrency is not legal tender and shall not be accepted".
No. We read five fair-play pages and recomputed no round, so nothing on this site claims a verified outcome.
